Minefield v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2012cv01089 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 5 memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's 4 objections are overruled; (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 3 recommendation is adopte d; (3) The 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/14/13. (Furnished to AG) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
Minefield v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DONALD MINEFIELD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv1089-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court: (1) Petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 4) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 3) is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) is denied because the required permission has not been obtained from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 14th day of January, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.