Smith et al v. City of Montgomery et al, No. 2:2012cv01037 - Document 79 (M.D. Ala. 2014)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dft City of Montgomery's 56 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of dft City of Montgomery and against plfs Carolyn Smith, Isaiah Sm ith, and Antonio Haigler, with said plfs taking nothing by their complaint as to said dft; Dft City of Montgomery is terminated as a party; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the Smith plfs and against plf Haigler, for which execution may i ssue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed; The summary-judgment motion is still pending as to the other dfts. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/26/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, ) (Entered: 06/26/2014)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith et al v. City of Montgomery et al Doc. 79 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION CAROLYN SMITH; ISAIAH SMITH; ANTONIO HAIGLER; and KANESHIA HAIGLER, as guardian and next friend of the minor, S.M., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA; et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv1037-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant City of Montgomery’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 56) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Montgomery and against plaintiffs Carolyn Smith, Isaiah Smith, and Antonio Haigler, with said plaintiffs taking nothing by their complaint as to said defendant. Defendant City of Montgomery is terminated as a party. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the Smith plaintiffs and against plaintiff Haigler, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 docket of the as a final Federal Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. The summary-judgment motion is still pending as to the other defendants. DONE, this the 26th day of June, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
