Daniels v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2012cv01015 - Document 13 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER and OPINION that it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 USC 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 USC 2255(f), and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/3/15. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Daniels v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 13 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT SHAROND DANIELS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv1015-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On January 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED because it was not filed within the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f), and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Done this the 3rd day of February, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
