Mitchell v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv01008 - Document 31 (M.D. Ala. 2015)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Dfts and against the Plf, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Costs are taxed against the Plf. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/18/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Mitchell v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BILLY J. MITCHELL, #207548, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. LEEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1008-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. DONE this 18th day of August, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.