Hughes v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama, No. 2:2012cv01007 - Document 53 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Defendant City of Montgomery's motion for summary judgment 36 is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Montgomery and against plaintiff Terry Hughes, with plaintiff Hughes taking nothing by h is complaint. It is further ORDERED that all other outstandingmotions are denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed againstplaintiff Hughes, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/6/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
Hughes v. The City of Montgomery, Alabama Doc. 53 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TERRY HUGHES, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA, a municipality, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv1007-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant City of Montgomery’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 36) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Montgomery and against plaintiff Terry Hughes, with plaintiff Hughes taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Hughes, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The case is closed. DONE, this the 6th day of November, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.