McQuarley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2012cv00907 - Document 72 (M.D. Ala. 2016)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 70 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants' 27 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/25/2016. (kh, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McQuarley v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CARLOS MCQUARLEY, #198 468, Plaintiff, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-907-WHA ) [WO] ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On February 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 70) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants. Done, this 25th day of February, 2016. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
