Reeves v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2), No. 2:2012cv00904 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's claims against defendants Scott, Mason, Giles, Nettles, and Whitley be and are hereby D ISMISSED without prejudice and prior to service of process; 3. Defendants Scott, Mason, Giles, Nettles, and Whitley be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and4. This case, with regard to the remaining defendant, be and is herebyREFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/22/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RICHARD KYLE REEVES, #255472, Plaintiff, v. DR. TAHIR SIDDIQ, M.D., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv904-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On December 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff s claims against defendants Scott, Mason, Giles, Nettles, and Whitley be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and prior to service of process; 3. Defendants Scott, Mason, Giles, Nettles, and Whitley be and are hereby DISMISSED as parties to the complaint under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and 4. This case, with regard to the remaining defendant, be and is hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done this the 22nd day of January, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
