Dorsey v. Glidewell Lawn Care Inc. et al (MAG+)(ACCEPT DISCOVERY), No. 2:2012cv00884 - Document 49 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 42 ) is adopted; (2) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 27 ) is denied; (3) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28 ) is granted; (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/31/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dorsey v. Glidewell Lawn Care Inc. et al (MAG+)(ACCEPT DISCOVERY) Doc. 49 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LEONARD E. DORSEY, Plaintiff, v. GLIDEWELL LAWN CARE, INC., et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv884-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 42) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 27) is denied. (3) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28) is granted. Dockets.Justia.com (4) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 31st day of October, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
