Matthews v. Haymons, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00870 - Document 116 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT: Final Judgment is entered against the Plf and in favor of the Dfts Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes and David Anderson, and Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Plf and against the Dfts Clarence Haymons and Bill Blue in the amount of $500, for which execution may issue; Costs are taxed against the Dfts Haymons and Blue. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/30/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Matthews v. Haymons, et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 116 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION COREY MATTHEWS, #168496, Plaintiff, vs. CLARENCE HAYMONS, DENNIS MEEKS, PRESTON HUGHES, BILL BLUE, and DAVID ANDERSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-870-WHA (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order of the court (Doc. #98), entered by the court on September 15, 2015, and the order of the court entered on this day, Final Judgment is entered against the Plaintiff and in favor of the Defendants Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes and David Anderson, and Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendants Clarence Haymons and Bill Blue in the amount of $500, for which execution may issue. Costs are taxed against the Defendants Haymons and Blue. DONE this 30th day of November, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
