Hoglan v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2012cv00864 - Document 30 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 29 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants' 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/26/2015. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hoglan v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 30 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES W. HOGLAN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN LEPOSEY DANIELS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv864-WHA ORDER AND OPINION On October 1, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 29). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 16) is GRANTED; 2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendants; 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Done this the 26th day of October, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
