Richburg v. Daniels, et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2012cv00803 - Document 20 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER that the 12 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the Plaintiffs claims against the Elmore Correctional Facility and the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and be DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action; and that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/30/2013. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA RICHBURG, #214 354 Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-803-TMH [wo] OPINION and ORDER On November 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 12). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, the Plaintiff s claims against the Elmore Correctional Facility and the Alabama Department of Corrections be DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915 (e)(2)(B)(I) and be DISMISSED as parties to this cause of action; and that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for additional proceedings. Done this the 30th day of January, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
