Matthews v. Williams et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00794 - Document 11 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's claims against Ken Thompson and Stephanie Atchison and his challenge to a lack of transfer to the custody of the Alabama Departmen t of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The plaintiff's claims against John Williams and Rufus Haralson challenging the conditions of confinement in existence at the Lowndes County Jail be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/2/2012. (jg, ) Modified on 11/2/2012 to clarify docket text (jg, ).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MAURICE D. MATTHEWS, #251986, Plaintiff, v. JOHN WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv794-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On October 4, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff s claims against Ken Thompson and Stephanie Atchison and his challenge to a lack of transfer to the custody of the Alabama Department of Corrections be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. The plaintiff s claims against John Williams and Rufus Haralson challenging the conditions of confinement in existence at the Lowndes County Jail be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Done this the 2nd day of November 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
