Lohr v. Zehner et al, No. 2:2012cv00533 - Document 153 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dft Wilmac Enterprises, LLC's 105 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of dft Wilmac Enterprises, LLC and against plf Richard I. L ohr II, with plf Lohr taking nothing by his complaint from dft Wilmac Enterprises, LLC; Dft Wilmac Enterprises, LLC is terminated as a party; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf Lohr, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/3/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
Lohr v. Zehner et al Doc. 153 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RICHARD I. LOHR, II, as ) Administrator of the Estate ) of Charles David Fancher, ) Deceased, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JOSEPH EARL ZEHNER, III, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv533-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Wilmac Enterprises, LLC’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 105) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wilmac Enterprises, LLC and against plaintiff Richard I. Lohr II, with plaintiff Lohr taking nothing by his complaint from Dockets.Justia.com defendant Wilmac Enterprises, LLC. Defendant Wilmac Enterprises, LLC is terminated as a party. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Lohr, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 3rd day of June, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.