Anderson v. Pullom et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00521 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that the 11 Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii). Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/5/2012. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DEWAYNE ANDERSON, AIS # 156270, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER D. PULLUM, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:12cv521-WHA ) ) ) ) OPINION and ORDER On August 13, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that the Recommendation be and is hereby ADOPTED, and that this case be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii). Done this the 5th day of September 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
