Harris v. Prittchert, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00450 - Document 27 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this court that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an availa ble administrative remedy as required by the directives of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 10/20/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

Harris v. Prittchert, et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 27 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. CURTIS PRITTCHERT, et al., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:12-CV-450-WC [WO] FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered herewith, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this court that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an available administrative remedy as required by the directives of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 20th day of October, 2014. /s/ Wallace Capel, Jr. WALLACE CAPEL, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.