Powell v. Doane et al, No. 2:2012cv00440 - Document 44 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this day, final judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants Jack Doane, David Perry, and Rex McDowell and against the Plaitniff, Rhonda B. Powell, on the Plaintiffs federal claim. The state law claim is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/23/13. (Furnished to Calendar/EB)(Term'd: Final PTC 09/26/13 and Jury Trial 10/28/13) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
Powell v. Doane et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RHONDA B. POWELL, Plaintiff, v. JACK DOANE, DAVID PERRY, and REX MCDOWELL, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:12cv440-WHA (wo) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this day, final judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants Jack Doane, David Perry, and Rex McDowell and against the Plaitniff, Rhonda B. Powell, on the Plaintiff’s federal claim. The state law claim is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. Done this 23rd day of August, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.