Stackhouse v. Cane et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00343 - Document 20 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION: that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Covington County Jail. 2. This case is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy provided to him during his confinement in the Covington County Jail as this remedy is no longer available to him with respect to the claims presented in the this cause of action. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/14/2012. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JAMES STACKHOUSE, #162181, Plaintiff, v. ANNETTE CANE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv343-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On August 23, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 18). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent the defendants seek dismissal of this case due to the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy previously available to him at the Covington County Jail. 2. This case is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. ยง 1997e(a) for the plaintiff's failure to properly exhaust an administrative remedy provided to him during his confinement in the Covington County Jail as this remedy is no longer available to him with respect to the claims presented in the this cause of action. DONE this 14th day of September, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
