Nails v. Geico Insurance et al(MAG+), No. 2:2012cv00321 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: JUDGMENT that plaintiff's 10 response is treated as objections and said objections are overruled; that 7 recommendation is adopted; that this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; that the clerk is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; that this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/22/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cc, )

Download PDF
Nails v. Geico Insurance et al(MAG+) Doc. 12 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION ANGELA DENISE NAILS, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE and JENNIFER VENDARS, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv321-MHT JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's response (Doc. No. 10) is treated as objections and said objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 22nd day of May, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.