Allah v. Gurley et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD), No. 2:2012cv00255 - Document 59 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER adopting the 58 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge;directing as follows: (1) defs' 18 & 56 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants; (3) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4)costs are taxed against the plaintiff; (5) final judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/24/15. (djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Allah v. Gurley et al (INMATE 2)(LEAD) Doc. 59 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JUSTICE I. ALLAH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DR. GURLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________ JUSTICE I. ALLAH, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:12-cv-255-WHA (WO) CASE NO. 2:12-cv-915-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #58), entered on March 2, 2015. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Docs. #18 and 56) are GRANTED. 2. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. 3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Costs are taxed against the Plaintiff. 5. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Dockets.Justia.com DONE this 24th day of March, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
