Kenner v. Forniss, et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00237 - Document 20 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: OPINION and ORDER that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 19 be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and4. Costs of this proceeding be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff forwhich execution may issue. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/1/2013. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION PRESTON KENNER, #136213, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN LEON FORNISS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv237-WHA OPINION and ORDER This litigation is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered on July 12, 2013, (doc. # 19), that this case be dismissed with prejudice. After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court believes that the recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The defendants motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4. Costs of this proceeding be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Done this the 1st day of August, 2013. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
