Parker v. Hawthorne (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00233 - Document 10 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION that the 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. To the extent the plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the claims are DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The plaintiff's pendent state law claims are DISMISSED as the court deems it inappropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these claims. 3. This case is summarily DISMISSED. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 4/19/2012. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONNIE ODELL PARKER, #162167, Plaintiff, v. RAYMOND JAMES HAWTHORNE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv233-WHA (WO) ORDER AND OPINION On March 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 9). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. To the extent the plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the claims are DISMISSED pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The plaintiff s pendent state law claims are DISMISSED as the court deems it inappropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these claims. 3. This case is summarily DISMISSED. Done this the 19th day of April, 2012. /s/ W. Harold Albritton SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
