McSheridan v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2012cv00134 - Document 56 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (2) That the state defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims against them in their o fficial capacities be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; (3) That the defendants' motions for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be and are hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DENIED as moot; (4) That the state defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff's claims for damages be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; (5) That the medical defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and that the plaintiff's claims against them be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and (6) That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with costs taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on March 17, 2015. (scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
McSheridan v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 56 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JASON L. McSHERIDAN, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACT. NO. 2:12cv134-WHA (WO) OPINION and ORDER On February 19, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 55). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the state defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s claims against them in their official capacities be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; 3. That the defendants’ motions for summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief be and are hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DENIED as moot; 4. That the state defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to the plaintiff’s Dockets.Justia.com claims for damages be and is hereby GRANTED and that these claims be and are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; 5. That the medical defendants’ motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED and that the plaintiff’s claims against them be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and 6. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with costs taxed against the plaintiff. Done this the 17th day of March, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
