Trantham v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2012cv00118 - Document 58 (M.D. Ala. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the order entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, Kim Thomas, Dr. Tahir Saddiq, and Warden Kenneth Jones, and against the Plaintiff, Harvey Joe Trantham , and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Kim Thomas and Warden Kenneth Jones, and without prejudice as to Dr. Tahir Siddiq. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/4/14. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

Trantham v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION HARVEY JOE TRANTHAM, #194985, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. KIM THOMAS, DR. TAHIR SADDIQ, and WARDEN KENNETH JONES, Defendants. CASE NO. 2:12-cv-118-WHA (wo) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the order entered in this case on this day, Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants, Kim Thomas, Dr. Tahir Saddiq, and Warden Kenneth Jones, and against the Plaintiff, Harvey Joe Trantham, and This case is DISMISSED with prejudice as to Defendants Kim Thomas and Warden Kenneth Jones, and without prejudice as to Dr. Tahir Siddiq. DONE this 4th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.