Smith v. Eike (MAG+) ACCEPT DISCOVERY, No. 2:2012cv00085 - Document 58 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the 56 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (2) defendant Robert Eike's 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; (3) judgment is entered in favor of def Eike and against plaintiff Smith, with plf Smith taking nothing by his complaint ; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf Smith, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/20/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Smith v. Eike (MAG+) ACCEPT DISCOVERY Doc. 58 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION PETER J. SMITH, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ROBERT EIKE, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv85-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 56) is adopted. (2) Defendant Robert Eike’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 49) is granted. (3) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Eike and against plaintiff Peter J. Smith, with plaintiff Smith taking nothing by his complaint. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Smith, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 20th day of February, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
