Ramey v. Giles et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2012cv00021 - Document 19 (M.D. Ala. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 18 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED as follows: 1. The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus are DENIED as they were not filed within the period of limitation established by applicable federal law. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 2/4/2015. (dmn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ramey v. Giles et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ABRAHAM RAMEY, #160238, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. J. C. GILES, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 2:12cv-021-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18), entered on January 14, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The petitions for habeas corpus relief (Docs. #1 and #2) are DENIED as they were not filed within the period of limitation established by applicable federal law. 2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 4th day of February, 2015. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
