Blatz v. Blatz et al (MAG+), No. 2:2011cv01105 - Document 17 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) plaintiff's 15 objections are overruled; (2) the 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is adopted; (3) this lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/12/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
Blatz v. Blatz et al (MAG+) Doc. 17 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TERRI L. BLATZ, etc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHRISTOPHER FRANCEN BLATZ, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv1105-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections (Doc. No. 15) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 14) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 12th day of October, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.