Beauchamp et al v. Wallace et al, No. 2:2011cv01029 - Document 188 (M.D. Ala. 2013)
Court Description: Judgment directing that, pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal (Doc. No. 179 ), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. and the claims against it are dismissed with prejudice , costs taxed as paid; Defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. is terminated as a party; further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 132 ), motion to strike (doc. no. 153 ), and motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 168 ) are de nied as moot; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/15/13. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Beauchamp et al v. Wallace et al Doc. 188 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION D’LIVRO BEAUCHAMP; and OBELISK HEALTHCARE, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. SPENSER CAPITAL GROUP, INC. and DE LAGE LANDEN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv1029-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant to the joint stipulation of dismissal (Doc. No. 179), it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. and the claims against prejudice, costs taxed as paid. it are dismissed with Defendant De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. is terminated as a party. It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 132), motion to strike (doc. no. 153), and motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 168) are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 15th day of October, 2013. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
