Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+), No. 2:2011cv00950 - Document 41 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 39 Recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) The 27 , 29 , & 35 Motions to Dismiss are granted; (3) The federal claims in this case are dismissed w ith prejudice; (4) The state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/8/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+) Doc. 41 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY MONIQUE COUCH, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL and OFFICER DANTE´JOHNSON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv950-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 39) is adopted. (2) The motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 27, 29, and 35) are granted. (3) The federal claims in this case are dismissed with prejudice. Dockets.Justia.com (4) The state-law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 8th day of June, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
