-SRW Judd v. Secretary of State of Alabama et al (MAG+), No. 2:2011cv00437 - Document 14 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's objections 12 are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's order 10 is affi rmed and her recommendation 10 is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) for failure to pay the civil-actionfiling fee. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue . The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/7/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
-SRW Judd v. Secretary of State of Alabama et al (MAG+) Doc. 14 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KEITH RUSSELL JUDD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF STATE OF ALABAMA; and STATE OF ALABAMA, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv437-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. No. 12) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s order (Doc. No. 10) is affirmed and her recommendation (Doc. No. 10) is adopted. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) for failure to pay the civil-action filing fee. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 7th day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.