Langford v. Federal Defenders Middle District Alabama et al (INMATE 3), No. 2:2011cv00255 - Document 12 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER and OPINION ordering and adjudging that the 11 Report and Recommendation of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 6/20/13. (djy, )

Download PDF
Langford v. Federal Defenders Middle District Alabama et al (INMATE 3) Doc. 12 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHAD EDWIN LANGFORD, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEFENDERS MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv255-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On May 21, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). DONE this the 20th day of June, 2013. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.