-CSC Tuck v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1), No. 2:2011cv00106 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and that costs be and are hereby TAXED against the petitioner; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/21/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
-CSC Tuck v. Hetzel et al (INMATE1) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TONEY DEANGELO TUCK, #186423, Petitioner, v. GARY HETZEL, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11cv106-ID (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice and that costs be and are hereby TAXED against the petitioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this the 21 st day of March, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.