-CSC Wool v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al, No. 2:2010cv01017 - Document 9 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: JUDGMENT; that plaintiff Lynda Wool's motion to dismiss 8 is granted and that defendants Jerry Hamilton and Paul Grater and the claims against them are dismissed. This case remains pending as to defendant Allstate Indemnity Company; that defen dant Hamilton's and Grater's motions to dismiss 3 & 4 are denied as moot. The court assumes that defendants Hamilton and Grater have no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if they do, they must file the objection withi n seven days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 12/13/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
-CSC Wool v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al Doc. 9 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LYNDA WOOL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ) JERRY HAMILTON, and PAUL ) GRATER, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv1017-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that plaintiff Lynda Wool’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 8) is granted and that defendants Jerry Hamilton and Paul Grater and the claims against them are dismissed. This case remains pending as to defendant Allstate Indemnity Company. It is further ORDERED that defendant Hamilton’s and Grater’s motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 3 & 4) are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com The court assumes that defendants Hamilton and Grater have no objection to the allowance of the dismissal; however, if they do, they must file the objection within seven days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 13th day of December, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.