Tyson et al v. Bancorpsouth Bank et al, No. 2:2010cv00927 - Document 60 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: AMENDED JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the judgment entered May 21, 2012 58 , is amended to read as follows:(1) The claims of plaintiffs Tommy Tyson and Eddie Jewel Tyson against defendants Bancorpsouth Bank, Rodge r L. Harris, and Vernice Josey are dismissed with prejudice. (2) The claims of counterclaim plaintiff Bancorpsouth Bank against counterclaim defendants Tommy Tyson and Eddie Jewel Tyson are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case remains closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/19/2012. (jg, )

Download PDF
Tyson et al v. Bancorpsouth Bank et al Doc. 60 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION TOMMY TYSON and EDDIE JEWEL TYSON, Plaintiffs, v. BANCORPSOUTH BANK, RODGER L. HARRIS, and VERNICE JOSEY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv927-MHT (WO) AMENDED JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the judgment entered May 21, 2012 (doc. no. 58), is amended to read as follows: (1) The claims of plaintiffs Tommy Tyson and Eddie Jewel Tyson against defendants Bancorpsouth Bank, Rodger L. Harris, and Vernice Josey are dismissed with prejudice. (2) The claims of counterclaim plaintiff Bancorpsouth Bank against counterclaim defendants Tommy Tyson and Dockets.Justia.com Eddie Jewel Tyson are dismissed without prejudice, with costs taxed as paid. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case remains closed. DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.