-CSC Sweeney v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1), No. 2:2010cv00747 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER; 1. That the 21 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendants' motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4. That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/21/2011. (jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CSC Sweeney v. Boyd et al (INMATE 1) Doc. 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DWIGHT SWEENEY, AIS # 187597, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS BOYD, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv747-ID OPINION and ORDER On February 2, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 21). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. That the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. That the defendants motion for summary judgment be and is hereby GRANTED; 3. That this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and 4. That costs be and are hereby TAXED against the plaintiff. Done this the 21 st day of March, 2011. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
