Hardy v. Whitehall Gaming Center, LLC, et al, No. 2:2010cv00573 - Document 92 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: JUDGMENT; that the joint motion for dismissal 89 is granted and that defendant Cadillac Jack, Inc. and the claims against it are dismissed without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs. This case remains pending as to all other defend ants and the claims against them. Furthermore, there being no just reason for delay, it is ORDERED that this judgment is final pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 9/27/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hardy v. Whitehall Gaming Center, LLC, et al Doc. 92 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION OZETTA HARDY and SHIRLEY WALLACE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WHITEHALL GAMING CENTER, LLC; et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv573-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the joint motion for dismissal (doc. no. 89) is granted and that defendant Cadillac Jack, Inc. and the claims against it are dismissed without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs. This case remains pending as to all other defendants and the claims against them. Dockets.Justia.com Furthermore, there being no just reason for delay, it is ORDERED that this judgment is final pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
