-SRW Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2010cv00547 - Document 17 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the Respondents, and against Petitioner Gene Beasley. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against the Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 10/18/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-SRW Beasley et al v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 17 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GENE BEASLEY, #161 851, Petitioner, v. WILLIE THOMAS, WARDEN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-547-ID (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the Court, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of the Respondents, and against Petitioner Gene Beasley. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against the Petitioner, for which let execution issue. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 18th day of October, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
