-TFM Oliver et al v. City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+), No. 2:2010cv00467 - Document 85 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The US Magistrate Judge's 82 Recommendation is adopted; (2) The plfs' 81 Motion for Leave to Amend is denied; (3) The dfts' motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 16 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , and 31 ) are granted; (4) All other outstanding motions are denied as moot; (5) This case is dismissed in its entirety; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plfs, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/8/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

Download PDF
-TFM Oliver et al v. City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+) Doc. 85 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION BEATRICE ELAINE OLIVER, et al., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, AL, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv467-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 82) is adopted. (2) The plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend (doc. no. 81) is denied. (3) The defendants’ motions to dismiss (doc. nos. 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, and 31) are granted. (4) All other outstanding motions are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com (5) This case is dismissed in its entirety. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plaintiffs, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 8th day of March, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.