Myer v. Easterling Correctional Facility Health Care Service Provider (INMATE 1)(CONSENT), No. 2:2010cv00406 - Document 35 (M.D. Ala. 2013)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered herewith, and for good cause,it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff and that this case be and is hereby D ISMISSED with prejudice, with costs taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/9/13. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF

Myer v. Easterling Correctional Facility Health Care Service Provider (INMATE 1)(CONSENT) Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION WALTER EDWARD MYER, AIS # 254298, Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVS., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv406-CSC (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered herewith, and for good cause, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and is hereby ENTERED in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff and that this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with costs taxed against the plaintiff for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Done this 9th day of April, 2013. /s/Charles S. Coody CHARLES S. COODY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.