Barnett v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2010cv00356 - Document 17 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the 16 opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:(1)The United States Magistrate Judge's 15 recommendation is adopted; (2)The 28 U.S.C. 2255 petition for writ of h abeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/29/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Barnett v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 17 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION LEWIS CARL BARNETT, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv356-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is adopted. (2) The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 29th day of August, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
