-WC Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+), No. 2:2010cv00287 - Document 45 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/2011. (wcl, )
Download PDF
-WC Frazier v. Colonial Bank et al (MAG+) Doc. 45 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION DAWN FRAZIER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. COLONIAL BANK, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv287-MHT (WO) OPINION Plaintiff Dawn Frazier filed this lawsuit against defendants Colonial Bank, Branch Banking and Trust Company (also known as BB&T), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (also known as FDIC), as receiver for Colonial employee of Bank. Colonial Frazier Bank, claims she that, was while an subjected to retaliation, a hostile-work environment, race and gender discrimination, and maternity-leave discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981a, 2000e to 2000e-17), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 2601- Dockets.Justia.com 2654). This matter is now before the court on the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the FDIC s motion to substitute party should be granted; BB&T s motions to dismiss denied as moot; the FDIC s motion to dismiss granted; and this case dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. filed objections to the recommendation. Frazier has After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that Frazier s objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge s recommendation adopted. An appropriate judgment will be entered. DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE