-WC Washington v. United States of America (INMATE3), No. 2:2010cv00279 - Document 22 (M.D. Ala. 2011)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) petitioner's 20 objections are overruled; (2) the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge is ADOPTED; (3) petitioner' ;s 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) is denied as time-barred; further ORDERING that the 6 motion to dismiss and 13 motion for writ of mandamus are DENIED; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which e xecution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/27/11. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-WC Washington v. United States of America (INMATE3) Doc. 22 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MARNAIL WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv279-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner’s objections (doc. no. 20) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge’s recommendation (doc. no. 14) is adopted. (3) Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct, etc., (doc. no. 1) is denied as time-barred. Dockets.Justia.com It is further ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 6) and motion for writ of mandamus (doc. no. 13) are denied. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 27th day of December, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
