North v. Daniels (INMATE 1), No. 2:2010cv00205 - Document 7 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER and OPINION that the 6 ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Mag Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: (1) plf's claims against the Alabama Dept of Corrections and the Elmore Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice in ac cordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I); (2) the Alabama Dept of Corrections and the Elmore Correctional Facility are DISMISSED as defendants in this cause of action; (3) this case, with respect to the allegations set forth against def Daniels, is referred back to the Mag Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 4/9/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TILLMAN NORTH, AIS# 252941, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN DANIELS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv205-ID ORDER AND OPINION On March 15, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The plaintiff s claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections and the Elmore Correctional Facility are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). 2. The Alabama Department of Corrections and the Elmore Correctional Facility are DISMISSED as defendants in this cause of action. 3. This case, with respect to the allegations set forth against defendant Daniels is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Done this the 9 th day of April, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.