Coons v. Meeks et al(MAG+), No. 2:2010cv00132 - Document 50 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: JUDGMENT directing that, in accordance with the 49 memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of this court as follows: (1) The plaintiff's motion to dismiss, orally made in open court on March 15, 2011, is gra nted; (2) The parties' motions to withdraw, orally made in open court on March 15, 2011, are granted; (3) The motions for sanctions (doc. nos. 36 & 44 ) are withdrawn; (4) All other pending motions are denied as moot; (5) This case is dismiss ed in its entirety, with the parties to bear their own costs; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of CivilProcedure. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/22/11. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
Coons v. Meeks et al(MAG+) Doc. 50 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION STANLEY L. COONS, JR., Plaintiff, v. DENNIS MEEKS, Sheriff, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv132-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of this court as follows: (1) The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss, orally made in open court on March 15, 2011, is granted. (2) The parties’ motions to withdraw, orally made in open court on March 15, 2011, are granted. (3) The motions for sanctions (doc. nos. 36 & 44) are withdrawn. (4) All other pending motions are denied as moot. Dockets.Justia.com (5) This case is dismissed in its entirety, with the parties to bear their own costs. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 22nd day of March, 2011. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.