North v. Ware (INMATE1), No. 2:2010cv00089 - Document 25 (M.D. Ala. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER AND OPINION directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 24 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is here by ADOPTED and that: (1) The defendant's 12 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; (2) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant; (3) This case is dismissed with prejudice; (4) The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 8/28/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION TILLMAN NORTH, #252941, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. OFFICER WARE, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv89-TMH ORDER AND OPINION On July 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 24). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1. The defendant s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 2. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the defendant. 3. This case is dismissed with prejudice. 4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the plaintiff. Done this the 28th day of August, 2012. /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.