Stinson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1), No. 2:2010cv00066 - Document 40 (M.D. Ala. 2012)
Court Description: JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the 38 Report and Recommendation of the Mag Judge is adopted; (2) the 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moo t; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/16/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stinson v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE1) Doc. 40 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION RENA D. STINSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10cv66-MHT JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 38) is adopted. (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is dismissed as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue. Dockets.Justia.com The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 16th day of November, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
