Flakes v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2010cv00057 - Document 9 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Clint A. Flakes and that Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED agai nst Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/23/2010. (cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Flakes v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CLINT A. FLAKES, #191 068 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN DANIELS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-CV-57-ID (WO) FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the prior proceedings and orders of the court, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that judgment be and the same is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff Clint A. Flakes and that Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit. It is further CONSIDERED and ORDERED that all costs herein incurred be and the same are hereby TAXED against Plaintiff, for which let execution issue. The clerk of the court is directed to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 23rd day of March, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
