Flakes v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2), No. 2:2010cv00057 - Document 8 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: ORDERS as follows: (1) The 7 Objection is hereby OVERRULED; (2) The 5 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; (3) Plaintiff's action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and (4) The Court will enter a separate final judgment. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 3/23/2010. (cb, )
Download PDF
Flakes v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2) Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CLINT A. FLAKES, #191 068 Plaintiff, v. WARDEN DANIELS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-CV-57-ID (WO) ORDER Before the Court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5, filed March 4, 2010) and Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 7, filed March 17, 2010). The Court, having conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Objection (Doc. 7) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED. 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 5) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED and AFFIRMED. 3. Plaintiff’s action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 4. The Court will enter a separate final judgment. Done this 23rd day of March, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com