Morris v. United States of America (INMATE 3), No. 2:2009cv01147 - Document 6 (M.D. Ala. 2010)
Court Description: JUDGMENT as follows: (1) Petitioner George Hoey Morriss 4 response is treated as a motion to withdraw; (2) Petitioner Morris's 4 motion to withdraw is granted; (3) Petitioner Morris's 2 motion to overturn conviction (Doc. No. 2) is wi thdrawn; and (4) The case is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 4/28/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(cb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Morris v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Doc. 6 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GEORGE HOEY MORRIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Civil Action No. 2:09cv1147-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner George Hoey Morris’s response (Doc. No. 4) is treated as a motion to withdraw. (2) Petitioner Morris’s motion to withdraw (Doc. No. 4) is granted. (3) Petitioner Morris’s motion to overturn conviction (Doc. No. 2) is withdrawn. (4) The case is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this 28th day of April, 2010. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
