Morris v. Coram (INMATE 3), No. 2:2009cv01107 - Document 8 (M.D. Ala. 2010)

Court Description: ORDERED that 7 Objection to the 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is OVERRULED; (2) The 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Jude is ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; (3)The claims against Defendant Coram be and the same are hereby DISMISSE D with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1), as this complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; and(4) This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1). The Court will enter a separate final judgment. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 7/16/2010. (cb, )

Download PDF
Morris v. Coram (INMATE 3) Doc. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF NORTHERN DIVISION GEORGE HOEY MORRIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CORAM, JR., Defendant. CASE NO. 2:09-CV-1107-ID (WO) ORDER Currently before the Court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6) and the Plaintiffs’s Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7). The Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff has objected. After this review, it is CONSIDERED and ORDERED that: 1. The Plaintiff’s Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #7) be and the same is hereby OVERRULED; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED, APPROVED, and AFFIRMED; 3. The claims against Defendant Coram be and the same are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1), as this complaint is not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; and 4. This case be and the same is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(A)(b)(1). 1 Dockets.Justia.com The Court will enter a separate final judgment. Done this the 16th day of July, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.