-TFM Guarantee Company of North America USA v. Sheryl B. Wainwright, et al, No. 2:2009cv01003 - Document 161 (M.D. Ala. 2011)

Court Description: PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT; The Court, with the consent of Plaintiff The Guarantee Company of North America USA ("GCNA") and Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright (collectively hereinafter, the "Parties"), hereby O RDERS final judgment in favor of GCNA and against Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright, separately and severally, in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00). The Court has jurisdiction over the s ubject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over the Parties. Solely for the purposes of this Consent Judgment and the underlying complaint, the Parties waive all objections and defenses t hat they may have to jurisdiction of the Court or to venue in this District. The Parties shall not challenge the Court's jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/20/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
-TFM Guarantee Company of North America USA v. Sheryl B. Wainwright, et al Doc. 161 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA, Plaintiff, v. SHERYL B. WAINWRIGHT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:09-cv-1003-MEF (WO) PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT Having found that there is no just reason for delay, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), the Court enters the following partial final judgment: The Court, with the consent of Plaintiff The Guarantee Company of North America USA (“GCNA”) and Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright (collectively hereinafter, the “Parties”), hereby ORDERS final judgment in favor of GCNA and against Defendants Stephen R. Wainwright and Sheryl B. Wainwright, separately and severally, in the amount of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND and no/100 Dollars ($500,000.00). The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over the Parties. Solely for the purposes of this Consent Judgment and the underlying complaint, the Parties waive all objections and defenses that they may have to jurisdiction of the Court or to venue in this Dockets.Justia.com District. The Parties shall not challenge the Court’s jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. Done this the 20 th day of June, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.